How on Earth is this Goddamned PROSTITUTE, a high class call girl at that, a VICTIM of anything but her own bad judgement. She’s not a victim of anything for God’s sake. You call yourself a man? You’re a pathetic cuck. Get lost sissy.
If you can’t get it through your head that you’re possibly having sex with a damaged person or a person with a possible illegal ID when you get yourself involved in prostitution then you’re too stupid to work in any office that involves our countries well being . He and all others involved can take their excuses for being a low character sleeze and shove it . They deserve whatever karma comes and that’s all that was .
Jesus this is nuts. They were trying to do this whole thing on the up and up. No underage girls. Check all ID’s. And as soon as they find out she’s underage, they call her on the carpet and read her the riot act and cut off all contact with her. They practiced full due diligence all the way.
How on Earth are we men supposed to figure that she’s lying about her age or has a fake ID? We’re not mindreaders. This is crazy.
You can’t convict people of a crime when they’ve been tricked into breaking the law. That violates mens rea, one of the cornerstones of law. Mens rea means guilty mind. Lacking mens rea is often enough for an acquittal.
I agree that it wasn’t sex trafficking, but maybe that’s the only law they had to work with? 🤷🏻♀️ As for “dating” women and buying them things and then calling them all prostitutes, that’s bullshit in my opinion. Just sayin… If I’m dating a guy and we’re in a relationship and he chooses to buy me something, that’s HIS choice. It’s not because he’s paying me for sex. It’s because he wants to do something nice for me, and vice versa…I may buy something for him too. I’m certainly not paying his ass for sex! 😂 Even if it’s just a one time date and you go out to dinner with someone and end up having sex with them…still not a prostitute. It’s just a date. Women have come far enough that we don’t need to be called prostitutes for enjoying sex once in a while. And Matt Gaetz is still a slimeball.
The only law they had to work with? Please. In other words they were determined to charge him with something, do they fished around and looked for some BS law to charge him with s as no found one.
😂😂 You have a point. But I was mainly replying to @Robert Lindsay comments about all women being prostitutes because you buy them things, which is in effect, “paying them,” can’t remember the exact wording.
But you are correct about the girl Gaetz was involved with. She had a fake ID.
Still though, I’m sure she looked young. What if it was your daughter? I have two daughters and
wouldn’t want that slimeball near either of them. Thankfully, my daughters have never been into
prostitution, but I’m sure they had fake IDs at some point. I did when I was a kid. I still think the OLDER MAN
should make sure who he is jumping into bed with if the girl looks really young and he doesn’t know her.
Then, he apparently bragged about it and showed videos to his buddies on the House floor! Did you hear that?
I know. When those girls, say 16+, want a man, they will move Hell and high water to get that man! They will try every trick in the book to get him. I see why men cave in. I’ve had seven of them, six 16 and one 15, openly proposition me just this year. And look how old I am! One included her Mom to sweeten the deal. And a couple of them really argued with me when I said no.
Of course I turned them all down as the AOC is 18 here, but it’s starting to get a little difficult 😂.
And I think I caught two of them lying about their age already. I’m not really worried about caving in. The main thing I’m worried about is them lying about their ages.
Here in California, 16-17 yr old girls having sex with grown men is absolutely epidemic. It’s off the charts. I can’t believe how many men are doing this. I think we need to either lower the AOC or reduce the penalties. You can’t have huge numbers of people breaking a law with serious penalties. We went through this pot in the 70’s and drugs in general now.
Well the government has decided if you’re either a legal minor female and you so much as buy her a sandwich, she’s now a prostitute. I said ok based on that the normal quid pro quo of straight sex means that all of us men have been buying prostitutes our whole lives and all of you women have been prostituting yourselves your whole lives.
I didn’t say that’s what the quid pro quo means. I said based on the government’s logic, that’s what it means.
You follow?
Whether the normal quid pro quo of straight sex is basically prostitution is a subject for another day I will not go into here.
I follow what you’re saying, but the logic doesn’t make sense.
You said that the government decided that if you’re a legal minor female, and you so much as buy her a sandwich, she’s a prostitute. (going to caps now so you can see my reply better) THIS DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE BECAUSE WHAT IF THAT LEGAL MINOR FEMALE IS A RELATIVE, OR A RUNAWAY THAT YOU COME ACROSS AT A DINER? YOU BUY THEM A SANDWICH AND SUDDENLY THAT GIRL IS A PROSTITUTE?
You then said, based on the normal quid pro quo of straight sex means that all of us men have been buying prostitutes our whole lives and all of you women have been prostituting yourselves your whole lives. (back to caps) BACK TO THE SANDWICH ANALOGY—YOU SAID IN YOUR OTHER MESSAGE THAT A QUID PRO QUO IS ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN THERE IS THE EXPECTATION OF SEX AFTER A PAYMENT OF SOME SORT, IN THIS CASE, THE SANDWICH. SO WOULDN’T THE MAN HAVE HAD TO EXPRESS TO THE SAID “LEGAL MINOR” THAT HE WAS EXPECTING SEX AFTER HE BOUGHT HER THE SANDWICH AND SHE WOULD’VE HAD TO AGREE TO THOSE TERMS FOR HER TO BE CONSIDERED A PROSTITUTE? AND BY THE SAME TOKEN, WOULDN’T ALL THOSE WOMEN IN YOUR LIFE HAVE HAD TO ALSO AGREE TO THE SAME TERMS TO BE CONSIDERED PROSTITUTES AS WELL? I’M NOT BUYING IT. EVEN IF THIS IS THE GOVERNMENT’S DEFINITION, IT STILL DOES NOT APPLY TO EVERY WOMAN IN EVERY SITUATION. YOU’RE REACHING.
Ok I don’t want to discuss this anymore. I said well it looks like the GOVERNMENT JUST DECIDED that all of us men have been whoremongers our whole lives and all of you women have been prostitutes your whole lives. I’m saying that’s kind of a lousy thing for the state to say, but it logically follows from their “Have sex with her and buy her a sandwich? Ok she’s a whore” philosophy.
I’m saying the government has a lousy legal theory and if we follow its logic, it leads to some rather yucky conclusions (that I’m not endorsing).
If you can’t follow me here I don’t know what to say. I’m not discussing whether the quid pro quo boils down to prostitution. I’m not going to discuss that right now.
But that’s what I was saying—I don’t do quid pro quo. Never have. I don’t believe that a man buying me dinner and then the date ending up with sex, means that he “paid” me for services rendered. Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying. I’ve never traded sex for anything that I wanted or needed, except for maybe the pure satisfaction of the sex itself. In a dating relationship, we’ve done the whole “make a bet and if you lose, you have to do whatever I want,” or “if you do the dishes tonight, I’ll give you a massage later.” Maybe that could be construed as a quid pro quo. But these are only done in the confines of a loving relationship and not in a transactional kind of way. It certainly would not make me a prostitute by any means. If men see it that way, I suppose I’ve been doing things wrong all these years.
Not just that! I had girlfriends who practically charged me every time I wanted to have sex with them. Had to take her to brunch, lunch, dinner. She never spent a nickel. After a while I thought about leaving a $20 bill on her nightstand after every time we did it.
I told my brother sbout her and he said,
“That’s just a whore.”
She was Black of course. Black women are notorious not giving it until you fork it over. And a lot of the time they dangle the sex, get the money, and disappear. They’re notorious for that.
I refer to them as a race of prostitutes. Black women are the worst race of women of them all. And I’ve had a lot of experience with them too.
I have mostly worked with Black women in a healthcare setting recently. There are some or many like that I'm sure - but certainly not the majority. I think this is a class thing - Church girl v Ghetto girl lol
I said if the government says that if you’re having sex with a legal minor and you so much as BUY HER A SANDWICH, she’s now a prostitute!
I SAID well sounds like the government is saying if you buy a female a sandwich and have sex with her, she’s a prostitute!
I said if that’s so then THE GOVERNMENT JUST SAID that the normal quid pro quo of straight sex (which I make no comment about) means all of us men have been buying prostitutes all these years and all of you you women have been selling sex for all these years.
I’m not commenting on the quid pro quo itself. That’s for another day.
Yeah I guess I’m going to argue with you here. First of all that’s not what I said. Read my response below. I didn’t even deal with the question of whether the usual quid pro quo of straight sex boiled down to prostitution. I agree with you that you’re not selling sex.
I’ve dated over 200 females in my life. I can assure that for a lot of females, that quid pro quo absolutely means they are trading sex for you spending money on them because that’s how they treat it. Some are so up front about it that they’re prostitutes in all but name.
17 and a half with a fake ID and you think the guy is a pedophile - I agree that he is a slimeball of the worst kind, but not a pedophile by any reasonable definition.
Calling banging teenage prostitutes SEX TRAFFICKING is just absurd. You’re banging her, not imprisoning her and forcing her to be a prostitute by force, coercion, and threats for God’s sake.
SEX TRAFFICKING was supposed to mean sex slavery, where they keep the women prisoner by threats and force them to be prostitutes. This is abuse of language.
Make it a crime, sure. Call it Patronizing a Minor Prostitute. I have no idea what the sentence should be. Up to s year or two? You tell me. But it’s not TRAFFICKING for God’s sake. This is a MORAL PANIC.
This clown is a male feminist. Geez what a traitor. Bros before hos, my man! Almost all progressive and Leftist men are male feminists just like this clown. The men of the Left are so pathetic.
Pedophile? Are you insane? She was 17 1/2 you Goddamned lunatic. She’s legal in most of the US and the world for that matter. How on Earth is banging a 17 1/2 girl PEDOPHILIA? That’s not the definition of pedophilia you anencephalic clown. Anyway he thought she was 18.
The Swiss Confederation had to change its laws on prostitution for 16-year-olds to comply with European legal standards. They raised the age to 18.
I suggest that no one should be allowed to do military service or prostitution until the age of 25 - when their brains are more or less fully developed. Though I don't think anyone should have to do either out of desperation. The economic angle is important here.
I can’t stand this argument about maturing brains. The Sex Panic crowd is using it to advocate for AOC’s of 21 or 25, etc.
Besides it’s pretty much bullshit. I’ve met a ton of 18-24 year olds and I was one myself for a while. It never occurred to me that any of us were not mature adults. Almost all your brain growth occurs between the ages of 10-15. After that it’s just a few add-ons.
And brain development lasts up until the early 30’s, so let’s extend adolescence that far, shall we?
Sorry comrade, I’ll have to disagree on this one, brother.
Well yes there are some changes in brain development but I don’t think they are super significant. It’s nothing you can readily observe. The frontal lobes do continue to develop from age 18-25.
There aren’t that many women whoring themselves out to pay the rent or put food on the table. It’s a feminist myth. Most prostitutes have a drug habit or they’re making bank. A lot of others would rather fuck for money than work.
There is something called “survival sex” that a lot of economically marginal women engage in but most of those are homeless women.
As I predicted, Gaetz is not going to be Attorney General.
It's time for the young girl who later became a porn start to reveal herself - getting paid of course - and tell us all the lurid details.
I suggest an interview with Oprah.
Of course.
Not that it appeals to my "prurient" interests, but I just want to know.
Good job Robert
The Republicunt senators are freaking out over this appointment.
Please note that I'm not referring to the Republican female Senators here.
I'm using the term "Republicunt" in a gender neutral manner.
There should be more comments for this.
I guess people are at work - maybe later today.
I'm curious about the feedback on this one.
Yeah it’s really going to set some people off I’m afraid. I rewrote the whole piece to make it more palatable and less incendiary.
I agree with you here - we need to stop paying.
Now I'll just have to find a way to break the news to my wife lol
God, I hope she doesn't read this.
How on Earth is this Goddamned PROSTITUTE, a high class call girl at that, a VICTIM of anything but her own bad judgement. She’s not a victim of anything for God’s sake. You call yourself a man? You’re a pathetic cuck. Get lost sissy.
If you can’t get it through your head that you’re possibly having sex with a damaged person or a person with a possible illegal ID when you get yourself involved in prostitution then you’re too stupid to work in any office that involves our countries well being . He and all others involved can take their excuses for being a low character sleeze and shove it . They deserve whatever karma comes and that’s all that was .
I agree with you here - but the allegation of sex trafficking doesn't fit here - I agree with Robert on that one.
Couldn't Trump find someone sleazier for Attorney General? lol
I suspect GOP opposition on this nomination - these guys need to run for reelection in 2 years, many of them anyway.
The GOP Götterdämmerung begins lol
I agree that maybe a person like this should not hold public office.
Congratulations for participating in a moral panic.
Jesus this is nuts. They were trying to do this whole thing on the up and up. No underage girls. Check all ID’s. And as soon as they find out she’s underage, they call her on the carpet and read her the riot act and cut off all contact with her. They practiced full due diligence all the way.
How on Earth are we men supposed to figure that she’s lying about her age or has a fake ID? We’re not mindreaders. This is crazy.
You can’t convict people of a crime when they’ve been tricked into breaking the law. That violates mens rea, one of the cornerstones of law. Mens rea means guilty mind. Lacking mens rea is often enough for an acquittal.
I agree that it wasn’t sex trafficking, but maybe that’s the only law they had to work with? 🤷🏻♀️ As for “dating” women and buying them things and then calling them all prostitutes, that’s bullshit in my opinion. Just sayin… If I’m dating a guy and we’re in a relationship and he chooses to buy me something, that’s HIS choice. It’s not because he’s paying me for sex. It’s because he wants to do something nice for me, and vice versa…I may buy something for him too. I’m certainly not paying his ass for sex! 😂 Even if it’s just a one time date and you go out to dinner with someone and end up having sex with them…still not a prostitute. It’s just a date. Women have come far enough that we don’t need to be called prostitutes for enjoying sex once in a while. And Matt Gaetz is still a slimeball.
Of course, you are right and notice that I did not call anyone a "prostitute".
But......A lot of male/female sexual relationships are transactional -
This girl was selling pussy - let's get real here.
And she was not intellectually disabled or anything.
17 and a half, fake ID?
For fucks sake.
No crime here
"The only law they had to work with"?
Let's not give credibility to the Republican accusations of "Lawfare"
Jesus
The only law they had to work with? Please. In other words they were determined to charge him with something, do they fished around and looked for some BS law to charge him with s as no found one.
Exactly. Where’s the crime. Also, no men’s rea or guilty mind.
😂😂 You have a point. But I was mainly replying to @Robert Lindsay comments about all women being prostitutes because you buy them things, which is in effect, “paying them,” can’t remember the exact wording.
But you are correct about the girl Gaetz was involved with. She had a fake ID.
Still though, I’m sure she looked young. What if it was your daughter? I have two daughters and
wouldn’t want that slimeball near either of them. Thankfully, my daughters have never been into
prostitution, but I’m sure they had fake IDs at some point. I did when I was a kid. I still think the OLDER MAN
should make sure who he is jumping into bed with if the girl looks really young and he doesn’t know her.
Then, he apparently bragged about it and showed videos to his buddies on the House floor! Did you hear that?
Gaetz is a vile creature - that is for certain.
I mean, I know it's not fair to say - but he just looks like one lol
Do you know what I mean?
Yes, I absolutely do know what you mean and agree wholeheartedly! He is the MOST vile!
If one of my daughters had slept with him, I think I’d have to shake them senseless and yell,
“I know I raised you better than that!!!” 😂 It’s hard work raising girls. Especially, intelligent,
independent girls who will grow up to be intelligent, independent women. (who both voted Democrat) ☺️
I just found Robert’s stuff yesterday and am reading it as I get the opportunity to do so and so far,
I’m enjoying his style.
Thank you very much, dear!
I did not read all the details - sorry
Yes - I understand how you feel and agree with you on that.
Robert never said that all women are prostitutes because we buy them things - lets be fair here.
Robert is an "Old School" male feminist"
Read his stuff - you will understand.
And - please contribute to this blog - we need more female voices here.
Also - hate to beg but this does cost money so please consider subscribing for a small monthly donation.
It really is a great blog.
Thank you for your input.
That’s right, I never said that. That’s a subject for another day…
I know. When those girls, say 16+, want a man, they will move Hell and high water to get that man! They will try every trick in the book to get him. I see why men cave in. I’ve had seven of them, six 16 and one 15, openly proposition me just this year. And look how old I am! One included her Mom to sweeten the deal. And a couple of them really argued with me when I said no.
Of course I turned them all down as the AOC is 18 here, but it’s starting to get a little difficult 😂.
And I think I caught two of them lying about their age already. I’m not really worried about caving in. The main thing I’m worried about is them lying about their ages.
Here in California, 16-17 yr old girls having sex with grown men is absolutely epidemic. It’s off the charts. I can’t believe how many men are doing this. I think we need to either lower the AOC or reduce the penalties. You can’t have huge numbers of people breaking a law with serious penalties. We went through this pot in the 70’s and drugs in general now.
Well the government has decided if you’re either a legal minor female and you so much as buy her a sandwich, she’s now a prostitute. I said ok based on that the normal quid pro quo of straight sex means that all of us men have been buying prostitutes our whole lives and all of you women have been prostituting yourselves your whole lives.
I didn’t say that’s what the quid pro quo means. I said based on the government’s logic, that’s what it means.
You follow?
Whether the normal quid pro quo of straight sex is basically prostitution is a subject for another day I will not go into here.
Do you follow me?
I follow what you’re saying, but the logic doesn’t make sense.
You said that the government decided that if you’re a legal minor female, and you so much as buy her a sandwich, she’s a prostitute. (going to caps now so you can see my reply better) THIS DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE BECAUSE WHAT IF THAT LEGAL MINOR FEMALE IS A RELATIVE, OR A RUNAWAY THAT YOU COME ACROSS AT A DINER? YOU BUY THEM A SANDWICH AND SUDDENLY THAT GIRL IS A PROSTITUTE?
You then said, based on the normal quid pro quo of straight sex means that all of us men have been buying prostitutes our whole lives and all of you women have been prostituting yourselves your whole lives. (back to caps) BACK TO THE SANDWICH ANALOGY—YOU SAID IN YOUR OTHER MESSAGE THAT A QUID PRO QUO IS ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN THERE IS THE EXPECTATION OF SEX AFTER A PAYMENT OF SOME SORT, IN THIS CASE, THE SANDWICH. SO WOULDN’T THE MAN HAVE HAD TO EXPRESS TO THE SAID “LEGAL MINOR” THAT HE WAS EXPECTING SEX AFTER HE BOUGHT HER THE SANDWICH AND SHE WOULD’VE HAD TO AGREE TO THOSE TERMS FOR HER TO BE CONSIDERED A PROSTITUTE? AND BY THE SAME TOKEN, WOULDN’T ALL THOSE WOMEN IN YOUR LIFE HAVE HAD TO ALSO AGREE TO THE SAME TERMS TO BE CONSIDERED PROSTITUTES AS WELL? I’M NOT BUYING IT. EVEN IF THIS IS THE GOVERNMENT’S DEFINITION, IT STILL DOES NOT APPLY TO EVERY WOMAN IN EVERY SITUATION. YOU’RE REACHING.
Ok I don’t want to discuss this anymore. I said well it looks like the GOVERNMENT JUST DECIDED that all of us men have been whoremongers our whole lives and all of you women have been prostitutes your whole lives. I’m saying that’s kind of a lousy thing for the state to say, but it logically follows from their “Have sex with her and buy her a sandwich? Ok she’s a whore” philosophy.
I’m saying the government has a lousy legal theory and if we follow its logic, it leads to some rather yucky conclusions (that I’m not endorsing).
If you can’t follow me here I don’t know what to say. I’m not discussing whether the quid pro quo boils down to prostitution. I’m not going to discuss that right now.
You can enjoy sex all you want to. But if you make quid pro quo a condition of your having sex with him, we’re on some pretty thin ice here.
But that’s what I was saying—I don’t do quid pro quo. Never have. I don’t believe that a man buying me dinner and then the date ending up with sex, means that he “paid” me for services rendered. Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying. I’ve never traded sex for anything that I wanted or needed, except for maybe the pure satisfaction of the sex itself. In a dating relationship, we’ve done the whole “make a bet and if you lose, you have to do whatever I want,” or “if you do the dishes tonight, I’ll give you a massage later.” Maybe that could be construed as a quid pro quo. But these are only done in the confines of a loving relationship and not in a transactional kind of way. It certainly would not make me a prostitute by any means. If men see it that way, I suppose I’ve been doing things wrong all these years.
No that stuff you describe fine in a relationship is not quid pro quo.
Lovers give each other gifts and play games as you described - that is not quid pro quo in this context.
I believe Robert is referring to transactional sex between to strangers.
I hope I'm helping to clear this matter up.
Not just that! I had girlfriends who practically charged me every time I wanted to have sex with them. Had to take her to brunch, lunch, dinner. She never spent a nickel. After a while I thought about leaving a $20 bill on her nightstand after every time we did it.
I told my brother sbout her and he said,
“That’s just a whore.”
She was Black of course. Black women are notorious not giving it until you fork it over. And a lot of the time they dangle the sex, get the money, and disappear. They’re notorious for that.
I refer to them as a race of prostitutes. Black women are the worst race of women of them all. And I’ve had a lot of experience with them too.
I have mostly worked with Black women in a healthcare setting recently. There are some or many like that I'm sure - but certainly not the majority. I think this is a class thing - Church girl v Ghetto girl lol
She so the religious ones are not like that. I think it is the majority of them. They all think they have a platinum plated pussy.
But I have heard some of the Black church girls refer to their Viginia's as money makers lol
Not touching that one.
I've heard some of the Black guys talk about it too - "If she wants this dick, she gonna pay".
What? The Black men are going to charge the Black women for sex? Good luck with that.
Well you’re not engaging in the quid pro quo.
Listen. You did misunderstand me.
I said if the government says that if you’re having sex with a legal minor and you so much as BUY HER A SANDWICH, she’s now a prostitute!
I SAID well sounds like the government is saying if you buy a female a sandwich and have sex with her, she’s a prostitute!
I said if that’s so then THE GOVERNMENT JUST SAID that the normal quid pro quo of straight sex (which I make no comment about) means all of us men have been buying prostitutes all these years and all of you you women have been selling sex for all these years.
I’m not commenting on the quid pro quo itself. That’s for another day.
You follow?
Yeah I guess I’m going to argue with you here. First of all that’s not what I said. Read my response below. I didn’t even deal with the question of whether the usual quid pro quo of straight sex boiled down to prostitution. I agree with you that you’re not selling sex.
I’ve dated over 200 females in my life. I can assure that for a lot of females, that quid pro quo absolutely means they are trading sex for you spending money on them because that’s how they treat it. Some are so up front about it that they’re prostitutes in all but name.
I went to school and worked with many nice church going ladies - many referred to their vagina as their money maker lol
I suspect they were joking - mostly lol
Wow! Victim blaming much? Fuck gaetz and fuck you for defending a fucking pedophile
Is it Hand time again Robert?
17 and a half with a fake ID and you think the guy is a pedophile - I agree that he is a slimeball of the worst kind, but not a pedophile by any reasonable definition.
Sure he’s a sleazeball. Of course he is.
Calling banging teenage prostitutes SEX TRAFFICKING is just absurd. You’re banging her, not imprisoning her and forcing her to be a prostitute by force, coercion, and threats for God’s sake.
SEX TRAFFICKING was supposed to mean sex slavery, where they keep the women prisoner by threats and force them to be prostitutes. This is abuse of language.
Make it a crime, sure. Call it Patronizing a Minor Prostitute. I have no idea what the sentence should be. Up to s year or two? You tell me. But it’s not TRAFFICKING for God’s sake. This is a MORAL PANIC.
17 and a half - not mentally ill - no intellectual disability?
Civil fine and counseling - no criminal penalties.
Sure if he knew she was underage that would be an appropriate crime.
An appropriate sentence.
The haters are out today lol
I don't think the girl was a victim.
She became a porn star later - still trying to find out who she is
Thank you, Robert, for writing this and supporting my prurient academic interests.
The only thing this woman is a victim if is her own poor judgement.
May have been good judgment - we don't know her mindset or how much she was paid.
Let's be fair here Robert.
In my opinion - neither party was guilty of anything.
If she had fucked Mat Geotz or whoever for free - then I would judge her lol
Sure you’re right. I was trying to be Woke and criticize this girl’s behavior in the accepted way.
But avoiding that, you’re right. Maybe she was just being smart.
You had it right - I was just mentioning a different angle.
This clown is a male feminist. Geez what a traitor. Bros before hos, my man! Almost all progressive and Leftist men are male feminists just like this clown. The men of the Left are so pathetic.
Pedophile? Are you insane? She was 17 1/2 you Goddamned lunatic. She’s legal in most of the US and the world for that matter. How on Earth is banging a 17 1/2 girl PEDOPHILIA? That’s not the definition of pedophilia you anencephalic clown. Anyway he thought she was 18.
By the way, HAND!
Age of consent in my state is 16.
The Swiss Confederation had to change its laws on prostitution for 16-year-olds to comply with European legal standards. They raised the age to 18.
I suggest that no one should be allowed to do military service or prostitution until the age of 25 - when their brains are more or less fully developed. Though I don't think anyone should have to do either out of desperation. The economic angle is important here.
Damn! AOC in your state is 16?! Hold on my friend I’m coming over!
I'll prepare the guest room for you - no need for a rental car as you can walk to two Baptist churches from my house - best pussy you'll ever have.
Come on down.
But don't buy her anything and remember to save up for a plane ticket back home in case she needs an abortion - it's illegal here
😂.
They do sell morning after pill as CVS - for now anyway.
I can’t stand this argument about maturing brains. The Sex Panic crowd is using it to advocate for AOC’s of 21 or 25, etc.
Besides it’s pretty much bullshit. I’ve met a ton of 18-24 year olds and I was one myself for a while. It never occurred to me that any of us were not mature adults. Almost all your brain growth occurs between the ages of 10-15. After that it’s just a few add-ons.
And brain development lasts up until the early 30’s, so let’s extend adolescence that far, shall we?
Sorry comrade, I’ll have to disagree on this one, brother.
I'm not suggesting AOC be 25 - just referring to prostitution and military service.
You may be right on the brain development thing.
I guess I'm thinking about emotional maturity and ability to make good decisions
Well yes there are some changes in brain development but I don’t think they are super significant. It’s nothing you can readily observe. The frontal lobes do continue to develop from age 18-25.
There aren’t that many women whoring themselves out to pay the rent or put food on the table. It’s a feminist myth. Most prostitutes have a drug habit or they’re making bank. A lot of others would rather fuck for money than work.
There is something called “survival sex” that a lot of economically marginal women engage in but most of those are homeless women.
True here in the USA and other economically similar countries. Poorer countries, different story.
Some women do it for luxury goods - new BMW etc..........
I favor legal prostitution, but the issue does not exist in a vacuum.
As long as the economy is well regulated so that no one has to engage in survival prostitution then I'm ok with it.
But - I also think that I should get it for free lol
I sure am shining thru with my semi porcine male attributes here today -
I think I've commented enough on this and other matters.
Also, can't think of anything to add
You’re great. You’re not a pig at all. You’re just a man. A REAL man.