Beyond Highbrow

Beyond Highbrow

Share this post

Beyond Highbrow
Beyond Highbrow
Why Conservatism Is Barbarism (Law of the Jungle, Social Darwinism, Survival of the Fittest)

Why Conservatism Is Barbarism (Law of the Jungle, Social Darwinism, Survival of the Fittest)

Robert Lindsay's avatar
Robert Lindsay
Jan 07, 2024
∙ Paid

Share this post

Beyond Highbrow
Beyond Highbrow
Why Conservatism Is Barbarism (Law of the Jungle, Social Darwinism, Survival of the Fittest)
Share

Commenter: First, let me say I take issue with your definition of conservatives as being barbaric retards.

Thanks, I changed that. I still think conservatism is backwards and barbarous. But it's not retarded.

Not only that but conservatism and conservatives will never go away. It and they will always be with us. My brother told me that and that's one of the smartest things he ever said to me. I think we Lefties have to reckon ourselves to that.

First of all, conservatism is always and only rule by aristocracy or rule by the rich. It used to mean "the divine right of kings. Read Leviathan for more on that. Locke was one of the first people to call bullshit on that obviously ridiculous notion.

After royalty vanished, conservatives simply substituted money, power and stuff for the aristocracy, so conservatism in our modern age is never anything but the rule of the rich over everyone who's not rich (although the upper middle class does benefit).

It's always the rule of the top 20% over the bo…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Beyond Highbrow to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Robert Lindsay
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share