The Feminist Argument about Rape Predictably Makes No Sense at All

Jul 15, 2025

In the past, people (by which I mean men and women) used to joke about 'feminine logic', the scatterbrain, contradictory way that women think and make decisions. Now, the inherent silliness of the female thought process, once a source of affectionate and forgiving amusement, has been multiplied to the point of absurdity to become 'feminist logic'.
Feminist logic is based on ideology rather than experience or learning, and it allows any number of contradictory theories and statements to coexist, as long as they are pro-female and anti-male. So, in feminist logic women are strong, powerful and intelligent and at the same time downtrodden, oppressed and unable to make their voices heard.
When it comes to the subject of rape, and who bears responsibility for it, the contrariness of feminist logic is so apparent that in any other circumstance it would evoke derisive laughter (were it not for the fact that it's now men whose voices are not allowed to be heard).
On the one hand men are portrayed as animalistic predators who cannot control their sexual urges and pose a constant threat to women. On the other hand (say the feminists), women should be free to dress as provocatively as they want and walk the streets at night without fear of molestation or even sexually motivated comment. It's like saying crocodiles are incredibly dangerous and at the same time we should be free to put our heads in their mouths.
If your daughter got her head bitten off after sticking it in the mouth of a crocodile, would you claim she bore no share of the blame? So how can a woman who dresses teasingly, accepts drinks from a stranger or walks home alone at night accept no blame for getting raped? Most of them get away with it, so the idea that men have no self restraint is plainly ridiculous.
In fact it's women who can't help themselves behaving irresponsibly. Women crave sexual attention. They compete for it every moment they are in public. If other women are wearing higher hemlines and lower necklines this season, they instinctively follow suit. They are out to provoke lust and they know exactly what they are doing. The real 'victims' are the frustrated men who have to watch all this but find it necessary not to act on their impulses.

You really don’t know where I found this, but I guess you can web search if you need to know. Anyway, the site is NSFW. Also you might have to join the site to read the stuff on there. Unfortunately the man who penned these words is an open misogynist, but a lot of men are proudly claiming that label lately. It’s become a sex kink which is fine by me as long as its not serious. Problem is most people into this “sex kink” like with so many of the others, are serious about it and actually believe in it.

Bit by bit.

Feminist logic is based on ideology rather than experience or learning, and it allows any number of contradictory theories and statements to coexist, as long as they are pro-female and anti-male.

Of course. There’s no reason going into it, and it’s contradictory like much female thinking, an endless source of confounded thinking for us men. Women will not recognize the contradictory nature of their thoughts because your emotions defend their logic and will insist that they are correct even if obviously contradictory. And feminism is just a hate movement against men. Sure they needed their liberation and to some extent still do, and there probably is no liberation of any oppressed group with a hate movement against the oppressor, but still, obviously we don’t like it. You dig?

So in feminist logic women are strong, powerful and intelligent and at the same time downtrodden, oppressed and unable to make their voices heard.

I’ve noticed this forever. Feminism also infantalizes women and little girls, and feminists love this. This is because the Feminine Principle itself is infantalizing. It dreams of empowerment too. And course it makes no sense. Women are victimized children when this is convenient and empowered Superwomen when this is convenient.

When it comes to the subject of rape, and who bears responsibility for it, the contrariness of feminist logic is so apparent that in any other circumstance it would evoke derisive laughter (were it not for the fact that it's now men whose voices are not allowed to be heard).

Sure. Female rape paranoia, now turned ridiculously into murder paranoia which is more absurd, is legendary. When I was growing up they weren’t like this. Women were a lot more fearless and I liked them a lot better this way than I like these paranoid, hyperbolic, hysterical out nutballs. No logic goes into female rape paranoia because it’s a subject of pure emotion. Women say

Listen to your gut. It’s never wrong.

Oh bullshit. It’s wrong all the time, especially in overgeneralizing risk, which ends up pegging countless harmless men as extremely dangerous. Those are false positives. You can argue that no woman has ever been killed by a false positive and sure that’s true. But a lot of innocent men get hurt. Obviously false negatives are a lot more dangerous from the woman’s point of view, but women are always going off with dangerous men because they find them exciting and they find nice guys boring and pussy. I still get this crap even at this late date.

On the one hand men are portrayed as animalistic predators who cannot control their sexual urges and pose a constant threat to women.

To some extent of course it is true, but it’s vastly exaggerated. And most of us control ourselves just fine, especially at my age when I have to control myself 24-7.

On the other hand (say the feminists), women should be free to dress as provocatively as they want and walk the streets at night without fear of molestation or even sexually motivated comment.

I don’t buy the “she dressed provocatively so she deserved to get raped” line of course. But women are really pushing it when they dress like that. How on Earth do they expect men to act for God’s sake? What did they think was going to happen? Think, ladies, think.

This behavior is also cruel. It’s like offering a kid a piece of candy and pulling your hand away every time he gets close until he’s in tears. It’s almost sadistic. It’s also senseless. I’ve seen women say they get to wear the most provocative clothing because “it’s comfortable” and then say men have no right to even look at them, and if they do, it’s harassment. Insanity!

It's like saying crocodiles are incredibly dangerous and at the same time we should be free to put our heads in their mouths.

That’s exactly what feminist rape logic is saying.

If your daughter got her head bitten off after sticking it in the mouth of a crocodile, would you claim she bore no share of the blame?

If he’s saying that women put themselves in incredibly dangerous situations all the time, I’m game. Hey wait, what about rape paranoia? Whoops, another contradiction. Dangerous men make women wet and the pussy overrides the brain a lot in women, especially young women.

So how can a woman who dresses teasingly, accepts drinks from a stranger or walks home alone at night accept no blame for getting raped?

Well, when you are incautious and deliberately put yourself in dangerous situations, it makes no sense to complain about the obvious consequences of that. There’s such a thing as asking for trouble.

Most of them get away with it, so the idea that men have no self- restraint is plainly ridiculous.

As I pointed out, they get away with it the vast majority of the time. And they’re contradicting themselves again. Men are dangerous maniacs except when we are not, and this makes complete sense!